Peer review at a college level was very different from when I did it in high school. In high school we practically never did peer review and the work was really just on us. During peer review I received feedback about how some of my claims were strong and how it was nice on how I used personal experiences to connect to the readings. I also got feedback on if there wasn’t something that wasn’t making a lot of sense or if the sentence got the reader tripped up. These types of comments helped me a lot because I already acknowledge that even though what I type makes a lot of sense to me when someone else reads it, it doesn’t make sense at all really or its confusing for them to actually get what I am trying to say. Reading a peer’s work allowed me to kind of get a sese of what others’ views for the essay are and they also help realize other connections points that I can make into my own writing. Reading another peer work also helped encourage me a little on my writing I struggle with writing and actually liking what I put down so seeing others messed up parts helps me in turn. The biggest challenge of Peer review was doing the whole time and finding new mistakes or new things to comment on. At a point there’s only so much I can say because I really don’t have that well of sentence level editing and if I already looked at the essay and made comments about certain things it’s because that’s what stood out to me the most. It was a challenge to continue revising when I still feel like I only have so much to offer in advice.